White Guilt

Master case overview

Master file reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Illustrative status

Approved

Author / reference identity

Shelby Steele

Subject area

Race & Identity

Work

White Guilt

Review focus

Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.

Proposed formats · scenario

Ebook and library editions

Proposed market scope · scenario

Selected international editions; territories to be defined in the rights matrix

Book release date

2006
Open Library ↗

Registration date · illustrative

8 January 2006 – 7 January 2007 (release day unverified)

Publication and registration basis

White Guilt: Earliest dated catalog edition in the recorded first-publication year; editions may vary. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.

Modeled review date

8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified)

Source basis

Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 8 program records, 29 review controls and 0 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-IMRC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. IMRC-101

   Fact and opinion boundaries

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, separate editorial interpretation from independently checkable claims in proposed publicity. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IMRC-103

   Interview preparation

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, prepare source-backed responses and distinguish the author’s position from promotional paraphrases. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IMRC-104

   Edition-specific publicity

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, align retailer summaries and campaign copy with the edition proposed for release. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Publicity claim and source ledgerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Interview and media briefingCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-FCRS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. FCRS-102

   Source traceability

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, record author, date, edition and location of supporting references. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. FCRS-103

   Context and limitations

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, retain qualifications and avoid widening conclusions beyond their sources. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. FCRS-105

   Correction control

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Source bibliography and locator indexCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Claim qualification scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Correction and version logCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-PPAS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. PPAS-102

   Quotation context

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, retain the context and date of any quotations selected for publicity. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. PPAS-103

   Opinion classification

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, distinguish commentary from allegations and factual assertions. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. PPAS-104

   Institution references

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, avoid presenting an institution’s mention as its endorsement. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Quotation context sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Fact and opinion classification matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Institution reference reviewCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-LEIL

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. LEIL-102

   User limits

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, define proposed access periods and concurrent-user limits. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. LEIL-103

   Accessible editions

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, identify authorized accessible-format delivery routes. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. LEIL-104

   Excerpt reuse

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, document the scope of permitted educational extracts. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Access and licensing scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LEIL-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Accessible edition checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LEIL-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Educational excerpt permission sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LEIL-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-IDLC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. IDLC-101

   Agreement inventory

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IDLC-102

   License boundaries

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IDLC-103

   Retail metadata

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IDLC-104

   Accounting and reporting

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. IDLC-105

   Termination controls

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Distribution agreement inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Distribution license matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Retail metadata approval sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Royalty and reporting scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Termination and reversion checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-AVRR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. AVRR-101

   Audio grant

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, separate narration and audio distribution rights from print rights. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. AVRR-102

   Performer agreement

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, define narrator credit, recording use and permitted reuse. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. AVRR-103

   Audio-only material

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, identify proposed introductions, music and other added audio assets. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. AVRR-104

   Pronunciation guidance

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, prepare a subject-appropriate name and terminology pronunciation guide. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Audio rights matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AVRR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Narrator agreement checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AVRR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Audio asset permission registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AVRR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Pronunciation and production briefCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AVRR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-IRTC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. IRTC-101

   Chain of title

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IRTC-102

   Territory and format scope

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IRTC-103

   Edition history

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IRTC-104

   Quotation permissions

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. IRTC-105

   Reversion and reservations

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Territory, language and format matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Edition and rights chronologyCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Third-party permissions registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957-CAVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2006-SS-723957

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

White Guilt by Shelby Steele · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. CAVR-101

   Visual asset provenance

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, record the source and permitted use of cover and interior visual assets. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. CAVR-102

   Designer permissions

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, separate designer deliverables from third-party stock and font licenses. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. CAVR-105

   Edition approval

   For the proposed scope of White Guilt, track the approved cover version for each proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Cover and artwork provenance registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Designer and supplier rights checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Cover version approval logCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2006 – 12 January 2007 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2006 – 7 February 2007 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for White Guilt. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Consolidated program status

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 8 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

Total illustrative fees · USD$28,000

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

1. Retain the edition, format and rights schedules modeled in this record.
2. Check proposed changes against each program’s maintenance standard.
3. Reassess new translations, licenses or substantial promotional changes before extending scope.

This sequence describes the modeled approved workflow only.