Submission

Master case overview

Master file reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Illustrative status

Approved

Author / reference identity

Michel Houellebecq

Subject area

Classic & Literary Fiction

Work

Submission

Review focus

Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.

Proposed formats · scenario

Print and ebook

Proposed market scope · scenario

Selected international editions; territories to be defined in the rights matrix

Book release date

7 January 2015
Publication history ↗

Registration date · illustrative

14 January 2015

Publication and registration basis

Submission: Title and author matched publication-history record. Original-language/edition differences are retained where specified. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.

Modeled review date

14 February 2015

Source basis

Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 7 program records, 28 review controls and 0 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195-LESR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Submission by Michel Houellebecq · Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. LESR-101

   Successor authority

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify the party authorized to act for estate or successor rights. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. LESR-102

   Rights succession

   For the proposed scope of Submission, trace the relevant rights transfers without assuming estate ownership. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. LESR-103

   Edition-specific rights

   For the proposed scope of Submission, separate underlying text from later introductions, notes and translations. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. LESR-104

   Territory differences

   For the proposed scope of Submission, refer territory-dependent rights questions for verification. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. LESR-105

   Permission sign-off

   For the proposed scope of Submission, record the authority needed for each proposed grant. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Successor authority checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LESR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Rights succession chronologyCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LESR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Edition rights inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LESR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Territory rights review matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LESR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Successor permission protocolCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LESR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195-TFRR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Submission by Michel Houellebecq · Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. TFRR-101

   Translation grant

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify language, territory and format boundaries for a proposed translation. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. TFRR-102

   Translator rights

   For the proposed scope of Submission, document translator credit, assignment and permitted reuse. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. TFRR-103

   Terminology control

   For the proposed scope of Submission, prepare a terminology guide appropriate to the work’s subject area. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. TFRR-104

   Adaptation boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Submission, separate faithful translation from abridgment or local adaptation. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. TFRR-105

   Foreign edition approval

   For the proposed scope of Submission, define the approval process for translated covers and descriptions. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Foreign-rights grant matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: TFRR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Translator agreement checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: TFRR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Translation terminology briefCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: TFRR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Translation change-control sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: TFRR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Foreign edition approval checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: TFRR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195-ASPR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Submission by Michel Houellebecq · Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. ASPR-102

   Option terms

   For the proposed scope of Submission, document duration, exclusivity and exercise conditions for any proposed option. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. ASPR-103

   Reserved rights

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify publication and other rights excluded from the proposed grant. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. ASPR-104

   Creative approvals

   For the proposed scope of Submission, define any contractual consultation and approval checkpoints. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. ASPR-105

   Credit and materials

   For the proposed scope of Submission, document author credit and reuse of supplied publication assets. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Option term checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: ASPR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Reserved-rights matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: ASPR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Adaptation approval scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: ASPR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Adaptation credit and asset sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: ASPR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195-CYCS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Submission by Michel Houellebecq · Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. CYCS-101

   Audience definition

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify the intended age band without treating it as a universal suitability judgment. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. CYCS-102

   Context guidance

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify contextual guidance for a proposed classroom or youth edition. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. CYCS-103

   Edition differences

   For the proposed scope of Submission, distinguish complete, abridged and adapted editions. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. CYCS-105

   Review process

   For the proposed scope of Submission, define a documented local review process for disputed suitability decisions. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Intended audience briefCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CYCS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Reader and educator context notesCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CYCS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Youth edition comparisonCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CYCS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Suitability review protocolCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CYCS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195-LEIL

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Submission by Michel Houellebecq · Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. LEIL-102

   User limits

   For the proposed scope of Submission, define proposed access periods and concurrent-user limits. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. LEIL-103

   Accessible editions

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify authorized accessible-format delivery routes. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. LEIL-104

   Excerpt reuse

   For the proposed scope of Submission, document the scope of permitted educational extracts. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Access and licensing scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LEIL-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Accessible edition checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LEIL-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Educational excerpt permission sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: LEIL-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195-IDLC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Submission by Michel Houellebecq · Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. IDLC-101

   Agreement inventory

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IDLC-102

   License boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Submission, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IDLC-103

   Retail metadata

   For the proposed scope of Submission, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IDLC-105

   Termination controls

   For the proposed scope of Submission, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Distribution agreement inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Distribution license matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Retail metadata approval sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Termination and reversion checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195-IRTC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-MH-831195

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Submission by Michel Houellebecq · Narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. IRTC-101

   Chain of title

   For the proposed scope of Submission, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IRTC-102

   Territory and format scope

   For the proposed scope of Submission, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IRTC-104

   Quotation permissions

   For the proposed scope of Submission, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of narrative context, edition history and literary interpretation.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Territory, language and format matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative
• Third-party permissions registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 January 2015 · reviewed 14 February 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for Submission. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Consolidated program status

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 7 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

Total illustrative fees · USD$29,000

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

1. Retain the edition, format and rights schedules modeled in this record.
2. Check proposed changes against each program’s maintenance standard.
3. Reassess new translations, licenses or substantial promotional changes before extending scope.

This sequence describes the modeled approved workflow only.