Locking Up Our Own

Master case overview

Master file reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Illustrative status

On Hold

Author / reference identity

James Forman Jr.

Subject area

Law & Justice

Work

Locking Up Our Own

Review focus

Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.

Proposed formats · scenario

Print and ebook

Proposed market scope · scenario

English-language release; foreign editions subject to separate review

Book release date

April 2017
Publication history ↗

Registration date · illustrative

8 April 2017 – 7 May 2017 (release day unverified)

Publication and registration basis

Locking Up Our Own: Title and author matched publication-history record. Original-language/edition differences are retained where specified. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.

Modeled review date

9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified)

Source basis

Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 8 program records, 29 review controls and 19 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-DPPR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

1 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. DPPR-102

   Privacy boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, document a proposed basis for using private information, where applicable. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

2. DPPR-103

   Allegation handling

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, separate attributed allegations from findings and editorial opinion. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. DPPR-105

   Jurisdiction referral

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, identify markets where specialist review would be required. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 3

• Privacy and consent assessmentClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: DPPR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Attribution and allegation checklistCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: DPPR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Local-review referral matrixRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: DPPR-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-PPAS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

2 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. PPAS-101

   Public-record sourcing

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, link checkable public-affairs statements to their original records. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

2. PPAS-102

   Quotation context

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, retain the context and date of any quotations selected for publicity. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. PPAS-104

   Institution references

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, avoid presenting an institution’s mention as its endorsement. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 3

• Public-record source ledgerRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: PPAS-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Quotation context sheetCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Institution reference reviewCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-FCRS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

0 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. FCRS-103

   Context and limitations

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, retain qualifications and avoid widening conclusions beyond their sources. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

2. FCRS-104

   Data reproduction

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. FCRS-105

   Correction control

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 3

• Claim qualification scheduleRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: FCRS-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Statistical reproduction worksheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Correction and version logClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-NDIS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

2 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

1. NDIS-101

   Source provenance

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, trace research inputs to their origin and document verification limits. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. NDIS-102

   Confidentiality handling

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, separate public references from material requiring restricted access. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. NDIS-103

   Corroboration plan

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, identify which claims would need independent corroboration. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

4. NDIS-104

   Interview permission

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, document the scope of any proposed interview reuse. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

5. NDIS-105

   Redaction control

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, define version controls for any required redactions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 5

• Source provenance registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: NDIS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Source handling matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: NDIS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Corroboration worksheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: NDIS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Interview permission checklistCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: NDIS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Redaction and access logRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: NDIS-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-IMRC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

1 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. IMRC-101

   Fact and opinion boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, separate editorial interpretation from independently checkable claims in proposed publicity. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

2. IMRC-104

   Edition-specific publicity

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, align retailer summaries and campaign copy with the edition proposed for release. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. IMRC-105

   Escalation protocol

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, define which disputed statements would require specialist review before reuse. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 3

• Publicity claim and source ledgerRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IMRC-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IMRC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Media review escalation planClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IMRC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-IDLC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

1 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. IDLC-101

   Agreement inventory

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

2. IDLC-102

   License boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. IDLC-103

   Retail metadata

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 3

• Distribution agreement inventoryRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IDLC-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Distribution license matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Retail metadata approval sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-IRTC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

2 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

1. IRTC-101

   Chain of title

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. IRTC-102

   Territory and format scope

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. IRTC-103

   Edition history

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

4. IRTC-104

   Quotation permissions

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

5. IRTC-105

   Reversion and reservations

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 5

• Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Territory, language and format matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Edition and rights chronologyCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Third-party permissions registerRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IRTC-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Prior grants and reversion scheduleClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202-CAVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-JFJ-750202

Review scope

Print and ebook

Evidence position

1 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Locking Up Our Own by James Forman Jr. · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

1. CAVR-101

   Visual asset provenance

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, record the source and permitted use of cover and interior visual assets. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. CAVR-102

   Designer permissions

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, separate designer deliverables from third-party stock and font licenses. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. CAVR-104

   Credit requirements

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, record mandatory image credits and license conditions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

4. CAVR-105

   Edition approval

   For the proposed scope of Locking Up Our Own, track the approved cover version for each proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 4

• Cover and artwork provenance registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: CAVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Designer and supplier rights checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: CAVR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Visual credit-line sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: CAVR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 April 2017 – 12 May 2017 (release day unverified) · reviewed 9 May 2017 – 7 June 2017 (release day unverified) · illustrative
• Cover version approval logRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: CAVR-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for Locking Up Our Own. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Consolidated program status

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 8 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

Total illustrative fees · USD$27,500

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

1. Reconcile outstanding documents against the program references in the evidence index.
2. Prepare one coordinated completion package with edition, rights and source schedules.
3. Review each open item and record whether it is resolved, requires clarification or needs specialist referral.
4. Issue any subsequent determination only after the evidence review is complete.

This sequence describes the modeled on hold workflow only.