Being Mortal

Master case overview

Master file reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Illustrative status

Approved

Author / reference identity

Atul Gawande

Subject area

Health & Medicine

Work

Being Mortal

Review focus

Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.

Proposed formats · scenario

Ebook and library editions

Proposed market scope · scenario

English-language release; foreign editions subject to separate review

Book release date

7 October 2014
Publication history ↗

Registration date · illustrative

14 October 2014

Publication and registration basis

Being Mortal: Title and author matched publication-history record. Original-language/edition differences are retained where specified. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.

Modeled review date

14 November 2014

Source basis

Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 8 program records, 38 review controls and 0 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-HMPC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. HMPC-101

   Claim classification

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, separate general discussion from diagnostic or treatment claims in the proposed scope. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. HMPC-102

   Evidence quality

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, record study type, limitations and relevance for claims selected for review. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. HMPC-103

   Professional review

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, define the qualifications and scope needed for a proposed specialist review. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. HMPC-105

   Evidence updates

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify time-sensitive health references for later rechecking. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Health claim classification ledgerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: HMPC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Clinical evidence appraisal worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: HMPC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Specialist review briefCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: HMPC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Health evidence update scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: HMPC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-FCRS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. FCRS-101

   Claim inventory

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, classify factual, historical and statistical claims selected for the review scope. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. FCRS-102

   Source traceability

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, record author, date, edition and location of supporting references. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. FCRS-103

   Context and limitations

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, retain qualifications and avoid widening conclusions beyond their sources. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. FCRS-104

   Data reproduction

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. FCRS-105

   Correction control

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Claim-to-source ledgerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Source bibliography and locator indexCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Claim qualification scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Statistical reproduction worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Correction and version logCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-PFVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. PFVR-101

   Credential scope

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify exactly which professional claims are proposed for author positioning. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. PFVR-102

   Verification sources

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify primary sources needed to verify each credential. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. PFVR-103

   Jurisdiction wording

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, distinguish academic qualifications from jurisdiction-specific practice rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. PFVR-104

   Biography consistency

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, align proposed retailer, jacket and speaker biographies. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. PFVR-105

   Currency checks

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify which professional claims need date-sensitive confirmation. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Author credential claim inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PFVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Credential verification checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PFVR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Professional title wording matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PFVR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Biography comparison sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PFVR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Credential currency scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PFVR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-AEPC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. AEPC-101

   Promotional claims

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, match proposed promotional language to documented support. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. AEPC-102

   Endorsement consent

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, check scope and permission for any proposed blurb or endorsement. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. AEPC-103

   Material connections

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify sponsorship disclosures that would be needed for the campaign. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. AEPC-104

   Excerpt context

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, retain context when selecting extracts for advertising. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. AEPC-105

   Campaign versions

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, keep translated campaign copy aligned with the source version. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Advertising claim matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AEPC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Endorsement permission checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AEPC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Campaign disclosure scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AEPC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Promotional excerpt reviewCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AEPC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Campaign version registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: AEPC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-IMRC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. IMRC-101

   Fact and opinion boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, separate editorial interpretation from independently checkable claims in proposed publicity. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IMRC-102

   Non-affiliation wording

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, review references to people and institutions for unintended endorsement implications. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IMRC-103

   Interview preparation

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, prepare source-backed responses and distinguish the author’s position from promotional paraphrases. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IMRC-104

   Edition-specific publicity

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, align retailer summaries and campaign copy with the edition proposed for release. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. IMRC-105

   Escalation protocol

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, define which disputed statements would require specialist review before reuse. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Publicity claim and source ledgerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Non-affiliation wording sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Interview and media briefingCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Media review escalation planCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-IDLC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. IDLC-101

   Agreement inventory

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IDLC-102

   License boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IDLC-104

   Accounting and reporting

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IDLC-105

   Termination controls

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Distribution agreement inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Distribution license matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Royalty and reporting scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Termination and reversion checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-IRTC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. IRTC-101

   Chain of title

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IRTC-102

   Territory and format scope

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IRTC-103

   Edition history

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IRTC-104

   Quotation permissions

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. IRTC-105

   Reversion and reservations

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Territory, language and format matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Edition and rights chronologyCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Third-party permissions registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894-CAVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2014-AG-245894

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Being Mortal by Atul Gawande · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. CAVR-101

   Visual asset provenance

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, record the source and permitted use of cover and interior visual assets. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. CAVR-102

   Designer permissions

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, separate designer deliverables from third-party stock and font licenses. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. CAVR-103

   Format reuse

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, check proposed visual reuse across print, ebook, audio and promotion. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. CAVR-104

   Credit requirements

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, record mandatory image credits and license conditions. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. CAVR-105

   Edition approval

   For the proposed scope of Being Mortal, track the approved cover version for each proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Cover and artwork provenance registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Designer and supplier rights checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Visual reuse permission matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Visual credit-line sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative
• Cover version approval logCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 19 October 2014 · reviewed 14 November 2014 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for Being Mortal. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Consolidated program status

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 8 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

Total illustrative fees · USD$27,500

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

1. Retain the edition, format and rights schedules modeled in this record.
2. Check proposed changes against each program’s maintenance standard.
3. Reassess new translations, licenses or substantial promotional changes before extending scope.

This sequence describes the modeled approved workflow only.