Unfair

Master case overview

Master file reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Illustrative status

Approved

Author / reference identity

Adam Benforado

Subject area

Law & Justice

Work

Unfair

Review focus

Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.

Proposed formats · scenario

Print, ebook and audiobook

Proposed market scope · scenario

Selected international editions; territories to be defined in the rights matrix

Book release date

16 June 2015
Open Library ↗

Registration date · illustrative

23 June 2015

Publication and registration basis

Unfair: Earliest dated catalog edition in the recorded first-publication year; editions may vary. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.

Modeled review date

24 July 2015

Source basis

Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 8 program records, 33 review controls and 0 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-DPPR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. DPPR-101

   Identifiable people

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, inventory references to identifiable people without assuming that any passage is unlawful. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. DPPR-102

   Privacy boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, document a proposed basis for using private information, where applicable. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. DPPR-103

   Allegation handling

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, separate attributed allegations from findings and editorial opinion. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. DPPR-104

   Response process

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, record how disputed factual material would be escalated for response. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. DPPR-105

   Jurisdiction referral

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, identify markets where specialist review would be required. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Person-reference inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: DPPR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Privacy and consent assessmentCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: DPPR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Attribution and allegation checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: DPPR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Response and correction protocolCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: DPPR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Local-review referral matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: DPPR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-PPAS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. PPAS-101

   Public-record sourcing

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, link checkable public-affairs statements to their original records. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. PPAS-102

   Quotation context

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, retain the context and date of any quotations selected for publicity. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. PPAS-103

   Opinion classification

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, distinguish commentary from allegations and factual assertions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. PPAS-104

   Institution references

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, avoid presenting an institution’s mention as its endorsement. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. PPAS-105

   Source currency

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, identify time-sensitive references that would need updating. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Public-record source ledgerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Quotation context sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Fact and opinion classification matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Institution reference reviewCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Source currency checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: PPAS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-FCRS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. FCRS-101

   Claim inventory

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, classify factual, historical and statistical claims selected for the review scope. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. FCRS-103

   Context and limitations

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, retain qualifications and avoid widening conclusions beyond their sources. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. FCRS-104

   Data reproduction

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. FCRS-105

   Correction control

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Claim-to-source ledgerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Claim qualification scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Statistical reproduction worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Correction and version logCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-NDIS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

5 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 5

1. NDIS-101

   Source provenance

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, trace research inputs to their origin and document verification limits. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. NDIS-102

   Confidentiality handling

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, separate public references from material requiring restricted access. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. NDIS-103

   Corroboration plan

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, identify which claims would need independent corroboration. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. NDIS-104

   Interview permission

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, document the scope of any proposed interview reuse. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

5. NDIS-105

   Redaction control

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, define version controls for any required redactions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 5

• Source provenance registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: NDIS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Source handling matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: NDIS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Corroboration worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: NDIS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Interview permission checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: NDIS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Redaction and access logCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: NDIS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-IMRC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. IMRC-101

   Fact and opinion boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, separate editorial interpretation from independently checkable claims in proposed publicity. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IMRC-103

   Interview preparation

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, prepare source-backed responses and distinguish the author’s position from promotional paraphrases. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IMRC-104

   Edition-specific publicity

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, align retailer summaries and campaign copy with the edition proposed for release. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IMRC-105

   Escalation protocol

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, define which disputed statements would require specialist review before reuse. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Publicity claim and source ledgerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Interview and media briefingCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Media review escalation planCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IMRC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-IDLC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. IDLC-101

   Agreement inventory

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IDLC-102

   License boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IDLC-105

   Termination controls

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Distribution agreement inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Distribution license matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Termination and reversion checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-IRTC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

4 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 4

1. IRTC-101

   Chain of title

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. IRTC-102

   Territory and format scope

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. IRTC-104

   Quotation permissions

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

4. IRTC-105

   Reversion and reservations

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 4

• Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Territory, language and format matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Third-party permissions registerCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481-CAVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2015-AB-640481

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

3 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Unfair by Adam Benforado · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and scoped outcome 3

1. CAVR-103

   Format reuse

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, check proposed visual reuse across print, ebook, audio and promotion. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

2. CAVR-104

   Credit requirements

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, record mandatory image credits and license conditions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

3. CAVR-105

   Edition approval

   For the proposed scope of Unfair, track the approved cover version for each proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

   Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope.

Completed requirements 3

• Visual reuse permission matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Visual credit-line sheetCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative
• Cover version approval logCompletedSubmitted evidence accepted; this requirement is completed within the scenario’s approved scope. Reference: CAVR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 June 2015 · reviewed 24 July 2015 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for Unfair. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Consolidated program status

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 8 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

Total illustrative fees · USD$29,500

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

1. Retain the edition, format and rights schedules modeled in this record.
2. Check proposed changes against each program’s maintenance standard.
3. Reassess new translations, licenses or substantial promotional changes before extending scope.

This sequence describes the modeled approved workflow only.